In case you haven’t heard, a bunch of scientists have a massive, and I mean large, experimental machine in a tunnel underground in the Geneva area and running between Switzerland and France, and it is known as the Large Hadron Collider.
Modern evolutionists consider and hope that over, supposedly, thousands and thousands of years, random mutations in the genetic code of reproductive cells caused by environmental radiation will generate completely new genes. That is complete blind and irrational religion on the a part of evolutionists. It’s very similar to believing that randomly altering the sequence of letters in a romance novel, over millions of years, will turn it right into a e book on astronomy! That is the sort of blind faith macro-evolutionists have.
Prior to the invention of the telescope, we did not need proof that Pluto existed – we didn’t find out about it. Its existence was predicted due to the discoveries of Neptune and Uranus, which had been only potential with the invention of the telescope. Astronomers noted anomalies of their orbits and went in search of a ninth Planet X that would account for these, ultimately finding Pluto in 1930 (though the anomalies finally turned out to be the results of miscalculations and no Planet X was required).
In this television display screen grab taken from NBC, David Axelrod, a senior adviser to President-elect Barack Obama, speaks on distant interview throughout a live taping of Meet the Press at NBC’s studios December 28, 2008 in Washington, DC. David Axelrod, a senior adviser to President-elect Obama, Wealthy Lowry, editor of the Nationwide Evaluate, Todd Purdum, nationwide editor of Vanity Honest, Michelle Singletary, monetary columnist at the Washington Submit, and Richard Wolffe, senior White House correspondent for Newsweek, appeared on this system.
Doc Snow- Congratulations. A quick overview of your hub, it seems to be very detailed and thorough. It will take a little time to answer. In the meantime, I wish to begin a discussion board discussion with the remainder of the HubPages group. This will serve two purpose. It should expose this necessary matter to many hubbers and in addition it could create a new paradigm where two hubs by two hubbers can go head to head to present each side of a controversial subject in rather more element than typical dialog. Let me know for those who agree. Since it is a joint effort, I will solely proceed if you agree.